Forget MVPs -- We Need MITs!

Coaches and Players: Consider Thinking "MIT" vs. The Traditional MVP As You Prep For The Coming Season




By Paul Lubanski

With the 2011-2012 season fast approaching, I thought it might be constructive to introduce an alternative way of thinking as it  relates to preparing for the new year of competition for both coaches and players. Indeed -- I am certain that for many of you, the concept I am referencing above will require a major overhaul in approach from both the psychological and, subsequently, physical perspectives. However, in my opinion, the result can only be for the better -- far better.

So here goes...

As far as I am concerned, an award should exist that replaces the traditional MVP or "Most Valuable Player" designation that many youth team's and leagues dole at season's end. In place of the coveted MVP, I would substitute the MIT - "Most Important Teammate."

What the heck is the difference?

I am glad you asked.

Throughout hockey history, the MVP has typically been granted to the individual that scores the most goals. Obviously, goals are an extremely important part of the equation as it relates crafting a championship caliber hockey team. However, let's take a peek beneath the surface and look beyond the goals.

And ask the following questions:

- Does the top scorer even know what the defensive end of the ice looks like? In other words--is he/she a blatant defensive liability? What is his/her plus-minus number?

-Will this player EVER sacrifice a scoring opportunity to move the puck to a teammate who may be in an even more advantageous position to score?

-Does this player tend to sulk when the puck is not bouncing his/her way (tearing down their respective teammates in the process?

-Can you consider playing the high goal scorer on the penalty kill in a critical late-game situations?

 Now if the answer to any or all of the above questions is a resounding "yes," I am imploring you to re-consider just who may be the most deserving candidate on your club for an MVP/MIT-type award.

Because in my opinion, the MIT is someone by their mere presence on the ice, MAKES ALL OF THEIR TEAMMATES BETTER PLAYERS, hence the team A BETTER TEAM.

Specific characteristics of the MIT:

-The MIT is a player whose FIRST consideration is ALWAYS: "Where can I move the puck that will place our team in an improved position to score or defend?" This is as opposed to: "Where can I TAKE THE PUCK to bring attention to myself?"

-An MIT is every bit as pleased with a helper as he/she is with an actual goal.

-An MIT will willingly block shots and knowingly take hits to make the right play.

-An MIT will never intentionally take a shift off ... there would actually have to be extenuating circumstance to even notice a drop-off in energy or effort from him/her -- like an injury.

-An MIT's actions and words are always befitting of a player that places the TEAM ahead of all else.

In closing, I challenge both coaches and players to strive to build a team replete with MIT-accented individuals in 2011-2012. If you are successful is doing so, I guarantee that  the season experience be more fun for all involved--including the parents. And the neatest thing of all -- a bonus really -- is that you are far more likely to bring home a championship trophy or two along the way.

Best of luck.




You should follow CAYH Blog on twitter here.